Raushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.256 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-534 Year-2024 Thana- BARUN District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Raushan Kumar Son of Harihar Singh Village -Habaspur, P.S- Barun, District -Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Ms. Mukul Kumari, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-02-2025 Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 132, 303(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act.
3. As per prosecution case, 108 litres country made liquor and 8.625 litres foreign liquor has been recovered from line hotel of this petitioner and 27 litres foreign liquor has been recovered from house of this petitioner.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. No incriminating article has been recovered from conscious possession of this petitioner. Petitioner was not present at the time of alleged recovery.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.256 of 2025(2) dt.04-02-2025 2/2
5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and huge quantity of illicit liquor has been recovered from hotel and house of this petitioner. It is further submitted that petitioner has also got two criminal antecedents of similar nature.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, nature of accusation, huge quantity of recovery of illicit liquor and criminal antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T