← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./86653/2023bail granted

Pramod Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-19Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86653 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2021 Thana- BHAIRAVSHTHAN District- Madhubani ====================================================== Pramod Yadav Son of Baidehi Lal Yadav @ Bhedi Lal Yadav R/o vill - Dudhaila Kukurdaura, P.S. - Andhramath, Distt. - Madhubani, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Jitendra Bharti, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 19-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bhairav Asthan P.S. Case No. 72 of 2021 instituted for the offence under Sections 394 of the Indian Penal Code. 3.

It is alleged that four unknown miscreants have robbed the motorcycle, cash & mobile of the informant. 4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 22-09-2023. Petitioner bears four criminal antecedents, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioner's counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86653 of 2023(2) dt.19-01-2024 2/2 case. Name of the petitioner has been dragged in this case due to confessional statement of one co-accused, namely, Raj Kishor Kumar, who has already been granted bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 14-07-2023, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 40640 of 2023. It is further submitted that no T.I. Parade has been conducted in this case.

6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner and claim based on parity, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 8.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bhairav Asthan P.S. Case No. 72 of 2021, corresponding to G.R. No. 1068 of 2021.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T