Gaurav Yadav @ Gaurav Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9029 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-42 Year-2020 Thana- KHAGARIA District- Khagaria ====================================================== Gaurav Yadav @ Gaurav Kumar Son of Labbu Yadav Vill - Baba Tola Morkahi Ps - Muffasil Distt - Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shantanu Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 23-02-2024 Heard Ld. counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Khagaria (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 42 of 2020, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 307, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code in which subsequently, Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was also added.
3. Ld. counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had moved this Court earlier for regular bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 41849 of 2022, which was rejected with an observation that if the trial is not concluded within a period of nine months, the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. He further submits that since the trial has not been concluded in the stipulated time, the petitioner, vide present
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9029 of 2024(3) dt.23-02-2024 2/3 application, has renewed his prayer for bail.
4. Ld. APP for the State opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.
5. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, particularly the fact that the trial has not yet been concluded, this application is allowed, directing the petitioner, above named, to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Ld. Additional District and Sessions Judge-V, Khagaria, in connection with Khagaria (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 42 of 2020 on the following conditions:
(i) The petitioner will make himself available for interrogation by a police officer/court as and when required. (ii) The petitioner will undertake that investigation/trial will not hamper on account of his absence or non-cooperation. He must be available to the police or the court whenever his presence is required.
(iii) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9029 of 2024(3) dt.23-02-2024 3/3 (iv) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedent, Ld. court below shall cancel the bail bond of the petitioner after hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent despite his knowledge of the same. (v) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding the previous bail petition is wrong, Ld. Court below shall cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.
6. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the office within a period of one month and the Registry is directed to issue the certified copy of this order only after removal of office objections. (Jitendra Kumar, J) chandan/- U T