← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2484/2025withdrawn

Sampat Kumar @ Vikki @ Bikky v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-05Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2484 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-73 Year-2019 Thana- INDUSTRIAL District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1.

Sampat Kumar @ Vikki @ Bikky Son of Late Shankar Prasad Singh Resident of Village- Bahadurpur, PS- Zero Mile, District- Bhagalpur 2.

Shiv Kumar @ City Son of Late Shankar Prasad Singh Resident of VillageBahadurpur, PS- Zero Mile, District- Bhagalpur 3.

Rahul Kumar Son of Sanjeev Kumar Resident of Village- Koriyama, PSJanipur, District- Patna 4.

Kashinath @ Kashinath Ram Son of Dalbadar Ram Resident of VillageRani Talav, Asstt. Professor Bhagalpur Engineering College, P.S.- Industrial Area, Distt.- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Mukesh Kumar Son of Suresh Prasad Singh Resident of Bahadurpur, P.S.- Industrial Area, Distt.- Bhagalpur (Bihar) ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kamal Kishore Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Choubey Jawahar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 05-01-2026 Heard Mr. Kamal Kishore Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Choubey Jawahar, learned counsel for the State.

2. The present application has been filed for quashing of the discharge order dated 13.11.2024 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-XVII, Bhagalpur in S.T. Case No. 405 of 2024 arising out of Industrial Area PS Case No. 73 of 2019 registered for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 307,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2484 of 2025(4) dt.05-01-2026 2/2 379, 504 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has very fairly submitted that charges have been framed in the Court below and as such, the stage of the case has been changed.

4. In these circumstances, this application is dismissed as having become infructuous.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T