← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./90143/2024bail granted

Amit Kumar @ Amit v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-17Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90143 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-320 Year-2024 Thana- KOCHAS District- Rohtas ====================================================== Amit Kumar @ Amit S/o Madan Kumar @ Madan R/o VillageGopaniya(Bupania) Beri, P.S.- Badali, District- Jhajjar, State- Haryana ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Parwej Khan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Md. Anzarul Haque Sahara, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 17-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kochas P.S. Case No. 320 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, 336.90 liters liquor was recovered from a car.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is neither

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90143 of 2024(2) dt.17-01-2025 2/2 owner nor driver of the said car in question. The petitioner was not arrested on the spot. Name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of confessional statement made by co-accused, namely, Rajesh Kumar and the same has got no evidentiary value. The petitioner is in custody since 16.11.2024 and has got one criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Kochas P.S. Case No. 320 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T