Rekha Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3244 of 2024 ====================================================== Rekha Devi Wife of Umesh Ray Resident of Village-Bijdhari, Police StationKesariya, District East-Champaran (Motihari) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, I.C.D.S, Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Assistant Director, I.C.D.S, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari. 5.

The District Program Officer, East Champaran, Motihari. 6.

The Sub. Divisional Officer, Chakia, East Champaran, Motihari. 7.

The Block Development Officer, Kesariya, District-East Champaran, Motihari.

8.

The Child Development Program Officer, Kesariya, District- East Champaran, Motihari.

9.

The Commissioner, Tirhut Division at Muzaffarpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sudish Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Government Pleader 26 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 14-03-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1. For issuance of writ of Certiorari or any appropriate writ, order or direction for quashing the order dated 17.02.2017 passed in Memo No. 342 (Annexure-6) passed by District Programme Officer, East Champaran, Motihari, (Respondent

Patna High Court CWJC No.3244 of 2024(2) dt.14-03-2024 2/3 No. 5) whereby and whereunder the District Program Officer, East Champaran, Motihari has terminated the petitioner form the post of Anganbari Sevika, posted at Anganbari Centre No. 132 since 15.06.2004 under the Panchayat East Sundrapur, Project Kesariya.

II) For issuance of writ of Mandamus or any appropriate writ, order or direction for commanding the respondents authorities to reinstate the petitioner on her previous post of Anganbari Sevika of the Centre No. 132, and to give her the consequential benefit for the same."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a suit before the Ld. Civil Court having competent jurisdiction, for redressal of the aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

Patna High Court CWJC No.3244 of 2024(2) dt.14-03-2024 3/3 3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U