Aman Tiwari @ Aman Kumar Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85864 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-205 Year-2024 Thana- JALALPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Aman Tiwari @ Aman Kumar Tiwari Son of Bhim Tiwari Resident of village - Mangolapur, Police Station - Jalalpur, District - Saran (Chapra). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Brij Kishor Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Ataur Rahman., APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 12-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 208 of 2025 arising out of Jalalpur P.S. Case No. 205 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 191(3), 190, 118(1), 118(2), 109, 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. Earlier vide order dated 02.07.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 19311 of 2025 regular bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court considering the nature and gravity of offence.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 28.08.2024

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85864 of 2025(2) dt.12-12-2025 2/2 without any rhymes or reason and only charge has been framed against the petitioner and there is no progress in the trial and no any witness has been examined.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for grant of bail.

6. There is no fresh ground to consider the bail petition of the petitioner.

7. In view of the above, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is again rejected with a direction to the court below to expedite the trial and conclude the same expeditiously preferably within a period of six months from today. If the trial is not concluded within the period of six months, as stated above, the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer before the court below.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T