← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/24621/2019dismissed

Mukesh Mani Tripathi v. The State Of Bihar

2019-12-10Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.24621 of 2019 ====================================================== 1.

Mukesh Mani Tripathi Son of Sri Fanindra Mani Tripathi, resident of Village- Nagdahan, Areraj, P.S.- Malahi, District- East Champaran at Motihari.

2.

Amod Mani Tripathi, Son of Sri Ras Bihari Tiwari, resident of VillageNagdahan, Areraj, P.S.- Malahi, District- East Champaran at Motihari. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through The Principal Secretary, Cooperative Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari. 3.

The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Areraj, District- East Champaran at Motihari.

4.

The Block Co-operative officer, Block- Areraj, District- East Champaran at Motihari.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dr. Bipin Chandra, Advocate Ms. Kumari Chandna, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Raj Ballabh Pd. Yadav (AAG11) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 10-12-2019 The petitioners have sought a direction to the respondents to rectify and amend the voter list for the year 2019 for PACS society election for Nagdahan PACS. The aforesaid prayer has been made on the ground that respondent no. 6 has arbitrarily not included the names of 165 villagers, even though they had the qualification for becoming members of the PACS. This way,

Patna High Court CWJC No.24621 of 2019 dt.10-12-2019 2/2 it has been urged, the entire election process has been rendered meaningless.

In the event of election having been announced and the existence of provision of appeal, I am not inclined to entertain the present petition.

Should the petitioner prefer an appeal before the Registrar, Cooperatives within a period of three weeks, the same shall be considered on its own merits and shall be disposed of by a reasoned order within a further period of four weeks thereafter.

With the aforesaid direction/observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J) krishna/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 12.12.2019 Transmission Date