← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./90177/2025bail granted

Arun Sah @ Arun Kumar Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-15Justice Smt. Soni Shrivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90177 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-106 Year-2025 Thana- BADHAILA District- Rohtas ====================================================== Arun Sah @ Arun Kumar Gupta S/o- Ram Belash Sah R/v- Parariya PsBhaghaila Dist- Rohtas at Sasaram ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Chhote Lal Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Madhuri Lata, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 15-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 127(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 74, 303(2), 351(2) and 352 of the B.N.S.

3. The allegation in the First Information Report is that all the accused persons including the present petitioners assaulted the informant causing injuries.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a minor scuffle and altercation between the parties based on a petty issue of parking of the motorcycle has resulted in the present case and the same bears only general and omnibus allegations against the accused persons including the petitioner. The injuries suffered are simple in nature caused by hard and blunt object and the counter version of the case lodged by the petitioner's side also exists as co-accused Rajesh Sah has lodged the case against the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90177 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 2/2 informant and others on the same day. It has also been submitted that offence under Section 109 of the B.N.S. would not get attracted in the present facts and circumstances.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail on the basis of allegation made in the First Information Report.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances and considering the general and omnibus nature of allegations, coupled with the simple injuries suffered by two persons in the background of case and counter case, let the above named petitioner, who has no criminal antecedent, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Baghaila P.S. Case No. 106 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C/ Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. (Soni Shrivastava, J) anand/- U T