Abhishek Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80707 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-166 Year-2019 Thana- MUFFASIL District- Aurangabad ====================================================== ABHISHEK KUMAR S/o Shri Arvind Mahto @ Arbind Mehta R/o villageRaja Bigha, P.S.- Jamhore, District- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Nivedita Nirvikar, Adv, Mr. Dhaneshwar Vashist, Adv, Mr. Punit Kumar, Adv & Mr. Rohan Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Adv ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner who is in custody seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

Informant in his written complaint has alleged that his Tractor was stolen by unknown miscreants.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case on suspicion. FIR is against unknown. Petitioner is in custody since 27.08.2019.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80707 of 2019(2) dt.09-12-2019 2/2 amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending, in connection with Aurangabad Muffasil P.S. Case No. 166 of 2019, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U