Kanti Devi And ANR v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.959 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-182 Year-2018 Thana- NAWADAH COMPLAINT CASE District- Nawada ======================================================
1. Kanti Devi W/o Janki Mahto @ Janki Mahto Prasad
2. Sarita Devi W/oBiresh Mahto @ Brijesh Kr. Kushwaha, All R/vill-Bisiyait Tola, Redhe Mohan Bigha, P.S-Meskaur, Distt.-Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. State of Bihar and Anr
2. Latan Yadav S/o Late Bhattu Yadav, R/v-Bisiyait Tola, Redhe Mohan Bigha, P.S-MeskaurSirdalla, Distt.-Nawada.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Dr. Anand Kumar For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Md. Ansarul Haque ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 15-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
In this case, the petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Complaint Case No. 182 of 2018 registered for offence punishable under sections 323, 452, 380 I.P.C. and 27 of the Arms Act.
Both the petitioners are lady and the court below has taken cognizance under sections 323/380/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the story, which has been stated in the complaint petition, has been framed in order to implicate the petitioners and other co-
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.959 of 2019(2) dt.15-01-2019 2/2 accused persons.
Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for bail of the petitioners is allowed and they, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today, are directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Complaint Case No. 182 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 Cr. PC and also subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioners shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) mkchy/- U T