Kalu Singh @ Sanatan Kumar @ Kailu Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86729 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2024 Thana- PIPRIYA District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Kalu Singh @ Sanatan Kumar @ Kailu Singh Son of Babloo Singh @ Mritunjaya Kumar R/o Village and Post- Wallipur, P.S.- Piparia, DistrictLakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rabindra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-02-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State, Mr. Rabindra Kumar.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 448, 341, 323, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code as well as under Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and the informant alleges that accused persons came inside his house and on orders of Ramanand Singh, the named accused persons fired causing firearm injury to his son, further, Dharmraj Singh and Ramashray also fired at the informant but missed.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner next submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in the instant case by
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86729 of 2025(2) dt.18-02-2026 2/2 the informant. It is next submitted that no doubt in the FIR, it is alleged that accused persons fired causing firearm injury to his son, but then from perusal of the injury report of the son of the informant, it would manifest that no firearm injury was caused to him. It is further submitted that Ramashray Kumar had approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Criminal Miscellaneous No. 40515 2025 and the same came to be allowed by an order dated 02.09.2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, let petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Pipariya P.S. Case No. 49 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T