Narendra Pratap Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89538 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-234 Year-2025 Thana- SULTANGANJ District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Narendra Pratap Choudhary S/o Binay Kumar Choudhary Resident of - Ward No 6, Balughat Road, Sultanganj, P.S - Sultanganj, District - Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ravi Prakash Dwivedi , Advocate Mr. Rajesh Ranjan, Advocate Mr. Saurabh Raj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Raj Kishor Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State .
2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a case, registered for offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 303(2), 316(4), 316(5), 338, 336(3), 351(2), 352 and 60 of B.N.S., 2023.
3 . As per F.I.R., allegation against petitioner is that he in connivance with the other F.I.R. named accused persons, manufactured forged documents to misappropriate the valuable assets of Math causing substantial loss and damage. It is also alleged that they threatened the Mahanth to kill or falsely implicate him in criminal cases. In praragraph 8 of the impugned order, there is a finding of the trial Court that there is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89538 of 2025(2) dt.10-02-2026 2/2 possibility of repetition of offences and tampering with the evidence by the petitioners.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is quite innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case . Petitioner has got no concern with the alleged occurrence .
5 . Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. Considering the nature of accusation and the finding of the trial court, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner is rejected.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T