Patna High CourtCR. MISC./85872/2019bail granted

Manish Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2020-01-17Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85872 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-270 Year-2019 Thana- TATARPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== MANISH KUMAR SINGH Son of Shree Ram Singh Resident of Village - Hathiya Diyara, P.S.- Dhamdaha, District - Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Adv.

Mr. Vikram Singh, Adv.

Ms. Preety Kunwar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Amitesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 17-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 341, 354(B), 345(D) of the Indian Penal Code.

Informant has alleged that petitioner used to tease her and also indulged in obscene and indecent talks on her mobile alongwith his friends.

It has been submitted on behalf of petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 14.10.2019. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85872 of 2019(2) dt.17-01-2020 2/2 the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below, in connection with Tatarpur P.S. Case No. 270 of 2019 (G.R. No. 4744 of 2019) subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T