← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./86300/2025allowed

Sudhir Mistri @ Mangra v. The State Of Bihar

2025-12-17Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86300 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-950 Year-2025 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada ====================================================== Sudhir Mistri @ Mangra son of Late Kesho Mistri Resident of villageBhadoni Badai Tola, Police Station-Nawada Town, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raj Krishna Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 17-12-2025 Heard Mr. Raj Krishna Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Renu Kumari, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Nawada P.S. Case No. 950 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 117(2), 109, of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution in short is that the petitioner has assaulted the son of the informant with a brick indiscriminately; in the state of injuredness, he was rushed to the hospital.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86300 of 2025(2) dt.17-12-2025 2/2 perusal of the injury report, it will transpire that the son of the informant has receive simple injury caused by hard and blunt substance. He further submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 07.09.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Nawada P.S. Case No. 950 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T