Anil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81577 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-250 Year-2018 Thana- MUSAHARI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== ANIL KUMAR Son of Satynarayan Ray Resident of Village - Bhatauliya, P.S.- Mushari, District - Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravi Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ramchandra Sahni, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 27-05-2020 This matter has been taken up through Video Conferencing.

Heard the parties.

The petitioner is languishing in custody for the offences punishable under Sections 363/365/366A/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner is in custody since 16.11.2018. The FIR of the occurrence of kidnapping of the minor daughter of the informant is against unknown. On recovery the victim did not disclose in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. about the specific overt-act committed by the petitioner which would be evident from the impugned order itself. Investigation of the case is already complete. There is no chance of conclusion of the trial in near future.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81577 of 2019(3) dt.27-05-2020 2/2 Hence, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with S.Tr. No.448 of 2019, arising out of Mushari P.S. Case No. 250 of 2018, with following conditions: (a) Both the bailors shall be the resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court-below.

(b) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

(c) The petitioner shall not leave the country without permission of the trial Court.

If the petitioner would not be able in furnishing sureties due to lock-down, he shall be provisionally released on his personal bond and the provisional bail shall be confirmed only after production of the bailors within fifteen days of restoration of normal function of the Court.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- U T