Bhikhar Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86103 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2025 Thana- KARPI District- Arwal ====================================================== Bhikhar Das Son of Late Karu Das Resident of Village - Makhmilpur, P.S.- Karpi, District - Arwal.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anunay Shahi For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 15-01-2026 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 110 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 14-3-2025 at 8:45 pm, a holi milan programme was organised in which singers were singing, further the accused persons including the petitioner tried to stop the programme, on which villagers confronted, further Satyendar along with accused persons including the petitioner assaulted causing injury on head and he became unconscious and was taken to hospital.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86103 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 2/2 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that the date of occurrence is 14-32025 and the FIR came to be instituted on 16-3-2025 based on a written application of the informant. It is further submitted that had the petitioner been admitted in a hospital in that event his fardbayan would have been recorded at the hospital. It is also submitted that petitioner is aged about 70 years and has remained a person with clean antecedent, but then he came to be implicated in the instant case with general and omnibus allegation of assault. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Karpi P.S. Case No. 57 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T