Vikash Yadav @ Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.18591 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -42 Year- 2014 Thana -BARACHATTI District- GAYA ======================================================
1. Vikash Yadav @ Vikash Kumar S/o Late Bijay Yadav resident of Village - Tilaiya, P.S. - Barachatti, District - Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravindra Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-06-2018 Heard the parties. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Barachatti P. S. Case No. 42 of 2014, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 379, 385, 387, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. Allegation against the petitioner as per F.I.R. is that the petitioner demanded Rs. 12, 00,000/- as levy from the informant on different mobile numbers and on 13.1.2014 at 6.30 P.M. four persons came from two motorcycles and assaulted the Munshi of the informant.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has been made accused only on the basis of suspicion and nothing has been found against the petitioner.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18591 of 2018 (3) dt.19-06-2018 2/2 Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail on the ground that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R., and the case is of the year 2014 and the petitioner was absconding. In view of the facts and circumstances discussed above, let the petitioner, above named, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected with a direction to the petitioner that if the petitioner surrenders before the Court below and makes prayer for regular bail, which will be considered by the learned court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order of this Court. With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T