Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23935/2018bail granted

Rajiv Lal Srivastava v. The State Of Bihar

2018-05-14Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23935 of 2018 (2) dt.14-05-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.23935 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -571 Year- 2017 Thana -PATNA GRP CASE District- PATNA ====================================================== Rajiv Lal Srivastava aged about 28 years, Son of Lala Lal Srivastava, Resident of Village-P.O.+P.S.-Alipur, District-Gaya. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Nikunj Shekhar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 14-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The petitioner, who is in custody since 11.11.2017, has renewed his prayer for bail in connection with GRP Patna P.S. Case No. 571 of 2017 for the offence alleged under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code having earlier been rejected by this Court by order dated 01.02.2018 in Cr. Misc. No. 6365 of 2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has already completed six months in custody.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case and having regard to the period of custody already suffered since 11.11.2017, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Railway, Patna, District-Patna, in connection with GRP Patna P.S. Case No. 571 of 2017, on the following conditions:-

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23935 of 2018 (2) dt.14-05-2018 (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/BT U T