Aman Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87277 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-220 Year-2025 Thana- Jagdishpur District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Aman Kumar S/O Ravindra Giri Resident Of Village - Nawka Tola, Bahoranpur, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- West Champaran, Bihar. 2.

Manish Kumar S/O Vijay Giri Resident Of Village - Nawka Tola, Bahoranpur, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- West Champaran, Bihar. 3.

Nitish Kumar S/O Anil Giri Resident Of Village - Nawka Tola, Bahoranpur, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- West Champaran, Bihar. 4.

Ravi Giri S/O Anil Giri Resident Of Village - Nawka Tola, Bahoranpur, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- West Champaran, Bihar.

5.

Jitendra Giri S/O Gopal Giri Resident Of Village - Nawka Tola, Bahoranpur, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- West Champaran, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mayank Mohan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Umeshanand Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-12-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 37 and 45 of the Bihar Excise Act.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that he received secret information that 6-7 persons in drunken condition are creating ruckus near Bahoranpur Nakka Tola, accordingly the police reached at the place of occurrence,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87277 of 2025(2) dt.24-12-2025 2/2 when the accused persons started fleeing, but then Luvkush and Rajit were arrested in a drunken condition and they disclosed the name of the accused who fled including the petitioners. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that confessional statement in police custody does not have any evidentiary value. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 220 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section Section 482(2) of the BNSS. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T