Mukesh Jamadar @ Feku Jamadar @ Leman Tea v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85849 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-224 Year-2025 Thana- NAGARNAUSA District- Nalanda ====================================================== Mukesh Jamadar @ Feku Jamadar @ Leman Tea S/O Hari Jamadar R/O Village- Mahmadarpur, P.S- Nagarnausa, Distt.- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Raj Kishor Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 25-03-2026 Heard Mr. Rajeev Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Raj Kishor Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since 31.08.2025 in connection with Nagarnausa P.S. Case No.224 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 30.08.2025 for the offences punishable Heard Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, for the offences punishable under Sections 317(4), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and 25(1-B)A, 26/35 of Arms Act.
3. According to prosecution case, on secret information when police reached the place of occurrence, five persons started fleeing away but they were apprehended by the police. On search, police recovered one live cartridge, katta, one mobile phone, chain, knife and one motorcycle from the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85849 of 2025(3) dt.25-03-2026 2/3 possession of accused persons.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offences as alleged in the F.I.R and there is noncompliance of Section 103 of BNSS. He further submits that the police after investigation submitted the charge sheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 31.08.2025.
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that petitioner carries four criminal antecedents other than the present one but fairly submits on the basis of paragraph-3 of the bail application that the petitioner is on bail in the pending matters.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-Ist Class, Hilsa, Nalanda in connection with Nagarnausa P.S. Case No.224 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:-
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85849 of 2025(3) dt.25-03-2026 3/3 i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Suruchi/- U T