Dinesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.24305 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -79 Year- 2017 Thana -KHAJAULI District- MADHUBANI ====================================================== Dinesh Yadav, S/o Sury Deo Yadav, R/o Vill.- Chhapradhi, P.S.- Khajouli, District- Madhubani.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Harendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 11-06-2018 In view of the statements made at the bar, let the defect pointed out by the stamp reporter be ignored. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner, in the present case, is seeking regular bail in connection with Khajauli P.S. Case No.79 of 2017, registered for offences alleged under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is one of the accused and from his possession a pair of silver Payal and cash of Rs.1830/- has been allegedly recovered. It is further submitted that the cash as well as the silver Payal have not been put on T.I.P. and till date recoveries made from the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24305 of 2018 (4) dt.11-06-2018 petitioner have got no connection with the alleged occurrence. It is further pointed out that co-accused in Cr.Misc.No.27513 of 2018 from whose possession the key along with key-ring and three hundred rupees were allegedly recovered has been granted regular bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Some other co-accused have also been granted privilege of regular bail in Cr.Misc.No.17128 of 2018 and Cr.Misc. No.16881 of 2018. Learned APP for the State is present.

Considering the fact that the alleged recovered materials have not been put on T.I.P. and the co-accused similarly situated have been granted privilege of regular bail by a different co-ordinate Bench of this Court, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-III, Madhubani in connection with Khajouli P.S. Case No.79 of 2017, subject to the conditions U/S 437(3) Cr.P.C.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Arvind/- U T