Arvind Saw @ Arvin Kumar @ Arvindra Saw v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86336 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-105 Year-2025 Thana- SIKANDRA District- Jamui ====================================================== ARVIND SAW @ ARVIN KUMAR @ ARVINDRA SAW Son of Yadunandan Saw @ Yadunandan Shaw Resident of village - Nawdadih (Navwadih), Police Station - Sikandra, District - Jamui. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Nilendu Kumar Choudhary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rajiv Nayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 17-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Sikandra P.S. Case No. 105 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 329(4), 196, 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. The case of the prosecution in short is that the petitioner has assaulted with an iron rod to Safayat Alam indiscriminately.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that from
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86336 of 2025(2) dt.17-12-2025 2/2 perusal of the injury report of the victim, it is clear that all the injuries received by him are simple in nature, caused by a hard and blunt substance. Moreover, a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 04.11.2025.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jamui in connection with Sikandra P.S. Case No. 105 of 2025.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T