Vikky Alias Vivek Singh @ Pushraj Singh @ Pushpraj Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.787 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2023 Thana- BANGAWON District- Saharsa ====================================================== Vikky Alias Vivek Singh @ Pushraj Singh @ Pushpraj Singh Son of Deepak Kumar Singh Resident of Village- Sonpura, Ward No.-06 Police StationBakhtiyarpur, District- Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dinesh Maharaj For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bharat Bhushan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 16-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 394 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of Arms Act.

3. Allegation against the petitioner along with other coaccused persons is that they committed robbery in the shop of the informant on pistol point and also assaulted the informant. They looted away Rs. 80,000/- along with mobile phone of the informant. One co-accused, Kunal Kumar Jha was apprehended by the police.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.787 of 2024(2) dt.16-01-2024 2/2 falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in FIR rather his name came into light in this case on the basis of disclosure made by apprehended co-accused. Petitioner has been remanded in this case from another case. Nothing looted articles have been recovered from the conscious possession of this petitioner rather the recovery of some cash along with weapon has been made from the possession of apprehended co-accused. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 27.09.2023.

5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as custody of the petitioner, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Bangaon P.S. Case No. 83 of 2023 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-1, Saharsa. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) shubham/- U T