← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./718/2024allowed

Mukhiya Ji @ Rakshya Bhokta @ Rakshya Singh Bhokta v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-19Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.718 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-59 Year-2011 Thana- ROSHANGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== MUKHIYA JI @ RAKSHYA BHOKTA @ RAKSHYA SINGH BHOKTA SON OF LATE BHUKHAN BHOKTA RESIDENT OF VILLAGEPARSHACHUAN, PS- RAUSHANGANJ, DIST- GAYA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rahul Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 19-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under section 439 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is a case of 23 named accused persons including the petitioner herein and 50-60 unknown persons belonging to the M.C.C. Group are stated to have kidnapped three villagers. It is stated that subsequently the JCB machine etc. being used in construction of bridge etc. were put on fire.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner and no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.718 of 2024(4) dt.19-04-2024 2/2 specific overt act against him. It is further submitted that similarly situated co-accused person namely, Ravindra Parhia has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 07.02.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 71852 of 2023. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 29.04.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District and Session Judge, Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Raushanganj PS Case no. 59 of 2011. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) tusharika/- U T