Shyam Ranjan Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL REVISION No.10 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-436 Year-2024 Thana- SHASTRINAGAR District- Patna ====================================================== Shyam Ranjan Singh, Son of Ekram Singh, Resident of Village- Moab Kala, PS- Imadpur, Dist.- Bhojpur (Arra), at present - Gandhi Murti, Makan Sindhu Bhawan, Road No. 09, Patel Nagar, P.S.- Shastri Nagar, Distt.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Piyush Kumar @ Piyush Raj, Son of Sudhish Kumar Yadav C/O- Lal Mohan Ji, Resident of Village- Fulwaria, Distt. Gopalganj, at present- J.P.Colony, Near Bank of Baroda, P.S.- Sashtri Nagar, Distt.- Patna 3.
Vilash Kr @ Ayush Raj Son of Sudhish Kumar Yadav C/O- Lal Mohan Ji, Resident of Village- Fulwaria, Distt. Gopalganj, at present- J.P.Colony, Near Bank of Baroda, P.S.- Sashtri Nagar, Distt.- Patna 4.
Vikram Kumar @ Katty Son of Ram Chandra Mukhia Resident of Tumariya, P.S.- Laknaut, Distt.- Mahdubani, resident of Tumariya, P.S.- Laknaut, Distt.- Madhubani, at present Navanit Colony, P.S.- Rukanpura, Distt.- Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rajeev Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 12-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The present criminal revision has been filed against the order dated 28.10.2024 passed by learned Juvenile Justice Board, Patna in JJB Case No.498/2024, arising out of Shastri Nagar P.S. Case No. 436/2024.
3. Now Section 101 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as 'JJ
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.10 of 2025(3) dt.12-01-2026 2/2 Act') provides that any person aggrieved by any order made by the Board under this Act may prefer an appeal to the Children's Court. When provision for appeal has been made against the impugned judgment/order, this Court would not entertain the revision under Section 102 of the JJ Act. In these circumstances, this criminal revision petition is not entertainable.
4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present criminal revision petition with liberty to file an appeal before the appropriate forum in accordance with law.
5. Permission is accorded.
6. Accordingly, the present revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. (Arun Kumar Jha, J) V.K.Pandey/- U T