Chinta Devi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.25511 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -138 Year- 2016 Thana -GAURICHAK District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Chinta Devi, W/o Rajendra Rai,

2. Rinku Devi W/o Dharmvir Rai,

3. Usha Devi W/o Lali Rai, All Residents of Bakarchak, P.S.- Gaurichak, District- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Harish Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Arun Kumar Singh -5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-06-2018 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Gaurichak P.S. Case No. 138/16, registered for offences punishable under Sections 304(B), 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners are of demand of dowry and causing the death of the deceased.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that petitioner no. 1 is the mother in law and petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are sisters in law and they have nothing to do with the death of the deceased and no specific allegation has been attributed to them. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25511 of 2018 (3) dt.22-06-2018 2/2 on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate - 1st Class, Patna City, in connection with Gaurichak P.S. Case No. 138/16, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, as well as subject to the following conditions, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and make themselves available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T