Satendra Yadav @ Jamuna Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86471 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1281 Year-2023 Thana- SHERGHATI District- Gaya ====================================================== Satendra Yadav @ Jamuna Yadav S/O Late Balram Yadav R/O VillageGhorjara, P.S- Sherghati, Distt.- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, Advocate Mr. Anjani Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Parmanand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-01-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 354B, 307, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that this petitioner, along with other accused persons, unanimously assaulted informant and his family members with deadly weapons due to which, four persons sustained injuries.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Dispute with regard to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86471 of 2025(2) dt.07-01-2026 2/3 possession over a piece of land led to maar-peet between the parties in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case. The present F.I.R. has been lodged after inordinate delay of 5 days and there is no plausible explanation for the same which itself makes the entire prosecution case doubtful. Rest of the allegations are ornamental in order to make the case grave. Moreover, similarly situated co-accused persons have already been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Hon'ble Court vide order dated 03.09.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 40412 of 2025. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, case and counter-case between the parties, claim based on parity and clean antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86471 of 2025(2) dt.07-01-2026 3/3 each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-I, Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 1281 of 2023, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T