← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4496/2024bail rejected

Naushad v. The State Of Bihar

2024-02-19Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4496 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-763 Year-2023 Thana- ARARIA District- Araria ====================================================== Naushad S/o- Md. Zahir Resident of Village - Rampur, Mohanpur, P.S.- Araria (Bairgachhi O.P), District- Araria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gopal Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nirmala Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 19-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connect with Araria (Bairgachhi O.P.) P.S. Case No. 763 of 2023, F.I.R. dated 04.08.2023, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 384, 427, 327, 504 along with Section 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person of clean antecedent and the informant alleges that petitioner with sword assaulted his driver on head causing injury. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that there is a dispute going on in between the petitioner and the informant relating to property, as

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4496 of 2024(2) dt.19-02-2024 2/2 such, the petitioner was falsely implicated in the present case with frivolous allegation.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that from the perusal and order impugned it would manifest that the driver of the informant received two injuries on the head, which is vital part of the body.

5. Considering the said submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Court is not inclined to extent the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail, is rejected.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) aditi/- U T