Md. Shahid v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86677 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-378 Year-2022 Thana- KANTI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Md. Shahid S/o- Md. Nazir Village- Sadatpur PS- kanti Distt- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Kalyan Shankar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-01-2026 Heard Mr. Shashank Shekhar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Kalyan Shankar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Kanti P.S. Case No. 378 of 2022, F.I.R. dated 13.06.2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 393, 379 of the IPC.
3. According to prosecution case, three unknown persons armed with pistol reached at Chandani Chowk, Muzaffarpur, and tried to rob a truck while the informant and his helper were fixing the tyre of the alleged truck. On seeing police all the accused persons fled away after taking one motorcycle and 1-2 cartoons from the truck leaving their mobile phones in the truck.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86677 of 2025(2) dt.08-01-2026 2/3
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It appears from the F.I.R. that a mobile phone was recovered from the truck in question although the number of the mobile phone is mentioned in the F.I.R, which was recovered from the truck but from the seizure list it appears that there is no mobile number mentioned of the mobile phone which was recovered from the truck in question.
5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner carries one more case other than the present one but fairly submits on the basis of paragraph-3 of the bail petition that the petitioner is on bail in the pending matters.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-I, Muzaffarpur (West) in connection with Kanti P.S. Case No. 378 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86677 of 2025(2) dt.08-01-2026 3/3 with other following conditions:- i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) khushbu/- U T