Rajendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87030 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-282 Year-2025 Thana- BANKA District- Banka ====================================================== Rajendra Yadav Son of Late Suresh Yadav R/o -Bhaturai Gora, Chatrapal, P.S-Banka, District-Banka ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Manoj Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Lalan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 12-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that his sister was sleeping in the courtyard of her matrimonial home when accused persons came and Rajendra Yadav (petitioner) assaulted her by rod causing injury on head and she became unconscious, thereafter, Pawan Yadav tried to strangulate her and Sunita Devi and Lilawati Devi assaulted her on her waist and other parts of the body and accused persons
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87030 of 2025(2) dt.12-03-2026 2/3 also assaulted her father-in-law, further, Sunita Devi and Lilawati Devi snatched her ornaments.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegations, as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that informant is not an eye-witness to the occurrence nor he disclosed that disclosed that how he came to know that petitioner assaulted his sister. It is next submitted that the injury suffered by the injured has been opined to be simple in nature, as would manifest from Annexure-P/2 to the anticipatory bail application. It is further submitted that petitioner and the victim are agnates and are having dispute relating to property. It is next submitted that petitioner is not a criminal.
5. Learned APP opposes the anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, let petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Banka in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87030 of 2025(2) dt.12-03-2026 3/3 connection with Banka P.S. Case No.282 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of B.N.S.S. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Sanjay/- U T