Manoj Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85920 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-106 Year-2025 Thana- BELDOUR District- Khagaria ====================================================== 1.

Manoj Yadav S/o- Late Jamun Yadav R/v- Dhadhi Ps- Beldour DistKhagaria 2.

Dholo Yadav @ Ganesh Yadav S/o- Late Jamun Yadav R/v- Dhadhi PsBeldour Dist- Khagaria 3.

Sanjeev Yadav S/o- Late Jamun Yadav R/v- Dhadhi Ps- Beldour DistKhagaria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-02-2026 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application with regard to petitioner no. 3.

2. Permission is granted.

3. This anticipatory bail application with regard to petitioner no. 3 is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.

4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

5. Petitioner nos. 1 & 2 apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85920 of 2025(2) dt.09-02-2026 2/3

6. As per prosecution case, an incident of firing took place between co-accused Rakesh Yadav and Amrendar Yadav and others where 20 rounds of bullets were fired in which local co-villager got injured.

7. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Allegation against petitioners is general and omnibus and there is no allegation of any specific overt act against them. Informant and petitioners are co-villagers. During investigation, statement of the injured was recorded in which he has not alleged any specific allegation against these petitioners.

8. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.

9. Considering the nature of accusation and other facts and circumstances of the case, this anticipatory bail is allowed with respect of petitioner nos. 1 & 2 and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner nos. 1 & 2 in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Beldour P. S. Case No. 106 of 2025,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85920 of 2025(2) dt.09-02-2026 3/3 subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T