← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./643/2025bail granted

Sonu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-20Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.643 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-362 Year-2024 Thana- JANKINAGAR District- Purnia ====================================================== Sonu Kumar S/O Birbal Ram Resident of Village- Hatiya Tola, khunt, Nagar Panchayat, Ward No. 09, P.S- Jankinagar, District- Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 20-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Jankinagar PS Case No. 362 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 8(c), 21(b) of the NDPS Act.

3.

Prosecution allegation, in short, is that total 12.59 grams smack has been recovered from the co-accused persons, out of which 3.65 grams has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.643 of 2025(2) dt.20-01-2025 2/2 the petitioner further submits petitioner has no concern with the recovered contraband. The recovered contraband is below the commercial quantity. Hence, Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act is not applicable in the present case. The petitioner is in custody since 09-10-2024 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Sections 42 and 50 of the N.D.P.S. Act. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, recovery below commercial quantity, clean antecedent of the petitioner and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Jankinagar PS Case No. 362 of 2024 .

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T