Tikkar Yadav @ Tuntun Yadav @ Tikkar @ Tuntun Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87994 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-149 Year-2025 Thana- SAHEBPUR KAMAL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== Tikkar Yadav @ Tuntun Yadav @ Tikkar @ Tuntun Yadav S/o Ram Vilas Yadav Resident of Village- Gyantol, P.S.- Sahebpur Kamal, DistrictBegusarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Arjun Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Madan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 30-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case punishable for the offence under Section 103(1), 140(1), 238 r/w 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and there is specific allegation against him of being part of unlawful assembly, who assaulted informant and the deceased (Rakesh Kumar) and also on the instruction of co-accused Sita Devi, this petitioner opened fire and thereafter, he along with other coaccused persons forcibly kidnapped the deceased.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per F.I.R., this petitioner along with other five co-accused
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87994 of 2025(2) dt.30-01-2026 2/2 persons are alleged to have fired and assaulted son of informant with butt of pistol, but in the post-mortem report, only one injury has been found on the person of deceased, caused by hard & blunt substance. Thus, F.I.R. stands contradicted by the postmortem report. Similarly situated co-accused Raushan Kumar and Prashuram Kumar have already been granted bail by this Court, vide order dated 04.12.2025 in Cr.Misc. No. 84548 of 2025 and ordrer dated 27.01.2026 passed in Cr.Misc. No. 86193 of 2025. Petitioner is in custody since 04.08.2025. Chargesheet has been submitted.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as period of custody, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. - IV, Begusarai / concerned Court in connection with Sahebpur Kamal P.S. Case No. 149 of 2025.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T