Md. Ramiz Raja @ Raja v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.31081 of 2018 Arising Out of P.S.Case No. -10 Year- 2017 Thana -SAKRA District- MUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== MD. RAMIZ RAJA @ RAJA, Son of Anwar Khan, Resident of Golmuri, P.S.- Golmuri, District- Jamshedpur (Jharkhand). .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Niranjan Parihar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Priya Saran Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.
The petitioner is in custody in connection with Sakara P.S.Case No.10 of 2017 registered for an offence under Sections 356, 379, 412 and 395 of the IPC.
It has been submitted that the petitioner is neither named in the FIR nor any incriminating material has been recovered from him. In course of investigation one Bipin Kumar was apprehended in connection with Sakara P.S.Case No.39 of 2017. The said Bipin Kumar confessed his complicity and also disclosed complicity of other co-accused. The other co-accused whose name was disclosed by Bipin Kumar has been allowed bail by the court below itself. The petitioner has been remanded in this case on 06.04.2017.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31081 of 2018 (3) dt.09-07-2018 2/2 The learned APP opposed the submissions.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, prayer for bail is allowed. Let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10.000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 13th Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur in connection with Sessions Trial No.736 of 2017 arising out of Sakra P.S. Case No.10 of 2017 with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Sanjay Kumar, J) B.Kr./- U T