Vikash Ray @ Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86189 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-142 Year-2025 Thana- DALSINGHSARAI District- Samastipur ====================================================== Vikash Ray @ Vikash kumar S/o- Late Satto Ray R/o village- Pagra ward No. 12, P.S.- Dalsinghsarai, Dist- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Saket Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences under Sections 191(1), 190, 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 118(2), 324(2), 103(1), 352, 351(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. As per the prosecution case, on 17.04.2025 at about 4 PM, while informant was at his door, all the accused persons named in the F.I.R., including this petitioner, came and assaulted informant and his brother. It is further alleged that co-accused Sharwan Rai assaulted on the head of brother of informant with iron rod, as a result of which, brother of informant died in course of treatment. This petitioner is alleged to have assaulted informant with khanti.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86189 of 2025(2) dt.09-02-2026 2/2 specific accusation of assault to the deceased is against coaccused Shrawan Rai. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case due to long standing land dispute between the parties. Though petitioner is alleged to have assaulted informant but there is no injury report on record to substantiate the allegation. It is further submitted that similarly situated co-accused, namely, Puja Devi has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 11.11.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 75782 of 2025. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Samastipur / concerned Court in connection with Dalsing Sarai P.S. Case No. 142 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the BNSS.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T