Amarnath Tripathi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86653 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-240 Year-2025 Thana- SARMERA District- Nalanda ====================================================== Amarnath Tripathi S/O Late Sidheshwar Tripathi R/O Village- Tora, P.SSarmera, District - Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Pankaj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Anita Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Sarmera P.S. Case No. 240 of 2025 registered for the offence under Section 30(a), 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, the recovery is of 500 ml. of illicit liquor.
4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.
5. Considering the quantum of recovery, this application is allowed.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86653 of 2025(2) dt.19-12-2025 2/2
6. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the concerned Court below within four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Excise-II, Nalanda at Biharsharif/concerned Court below in connection with Sarmera P.S. Case No. 240 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 / Section 482 of the BNSS.
7. As the petitioner claims to have clean antecedent, the Court below, before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner is directed to verify the antecedent of the petitioner. If the petitioner is found to be involved in any other case then the bail bonds of the petitioner shall not be accepted. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Vikas/- U