Ramesh Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.35431 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -266 Year- 2005 Thana -JAGDISHPUR District- BHAGALPUR ======================================================

1. Ramesh Chaudhary Son of Baban Chaudhary Resident of Village- Mehan Tola, P.S. Jagdishpur, District- Bhojpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 13-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner has been in custody, for misuse of bail order which was granted to him earlier, since 11.04.2018 in connection with Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 266 of 2005 registered for the offences punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner had earlier been granted bail, subsequently Pairvi could not be done in his case and he was living outside the State for earning his livelihood and only on the ground of Pairvi, his bail bonds were cancelled. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that he shall abide by the terms and conditions of this Court.

As such, let the petitioner above named, be released

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35431 of 2018 (3) dt.13-07-2018 2/2 on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-Vth, Bhojpur, Ara, in connection with Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 266 of 2005, subject to the following conditions:-

(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, brother, sister and/or their wife.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) Saif/- U T