Fannu Singh @ Fannu Sardar @ Sudhanshu @ Parsunn Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82274 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2018 Thana- LAKHISARAI District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== FANNU SINGH @ FANNU SARDAR @ SUDHANSHU @ PARSUNN KUMAR Son of Abhay Singh Resident of Village - Bhawangama, P.S.- and Distt - Lakhisarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Bilash Roy Raman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Earlier, the bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide Annexure 1 with liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for grant of bail after completing one year in custody. It has been submitted on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is in custody since 19.07.2018. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of allegation, petitioner named above shall be released on bail, if the charges have been framed, and if not framed, then after framing of charges, upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82274 of 2019(2) dt.18-12-2019 2/2 pending in connection with Lakhisarai P.S. Case No.02 of 2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T