Akhilesh Kumar @ Guddu Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88706 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-290 Year-2025 Thana- WAJIRGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Akhilesh Kumar @ Guddu Singh, S/o Late Sabit Singh, Resident of VillageDakhingaon, P.S.- Wazirganj, District- Gaya, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate Mr. Kumar Rajdeep, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 08-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 290 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner along with others have taken Rs. 4 Lakhs from Kunal Kumar due to some land dispute and started threatening on demand of the cash. It is further alleged that the brother of the informant, namely, Kunal Kumar was called out of the house and Nitish Kumar in connivance with two unknown persons first of all fired at the brother of the informant and after that at his father. Both of them succumbed to be injuries.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88706 of 2025(2) dt.08-01-2026 2/2

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. From perusal of the F.I.R. itself it is clear that the allegation of firing is against Nitish Kumar and two unknown miscreants. Petitioner has been framed in this case as he is father of the main assailant. There is no allegation of any overt act against this petitioner. He is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 17.05.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the application for bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-Xth, Gaya in connection with Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 290 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T