Patna High CourtCR. MISC./87673/2025bail granted

Dinesh Yadav @ Dinesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-15Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87673 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-299 Year-2024 Thana- FATEHPUR District- Gaya ====================================================== Dinesh Yadav @ Dinesh Kumar S/O Rajendra Prasad Yadav @ Rajendra Yadav Resident of Village- Chhotaki Kuhari, P.S.- Fatehpur, District- Gaya (Bihar).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Ujjawal Kumar Singh, Advocate :

Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 15-01-2026 Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State as well as Mr. Ujjawal Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the Informant.

2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since 11.10.2025 in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 299 of 2024, F.I.R. dated 24.05.2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 354(B), 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 325, 307 & 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. According to prosecution case, it is alleged that petitioner along with other co-accused persons entered in the house of the informant and started abusing and assaulted the

2/4 family members of the informant by means of lathi, rod and danda.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is false and fabricated. Although the petitioner is named in the FIR but from bare perusal of the FIR it appears that there is no specific allegation of assault or overt act against him rather there is general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons including the petitioner and there is case and counter case between the parties and similarly situated coaccused persons, namely, Rajesh Kumar, Akhlesh Kumar @ Akhilesh Yadav, Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Yadav, Dinesh Yadav @ Dinesh Kumar have been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 14.05.2025, 20.08.2025 and 28.11.2025 in Cr. Misc. No. 6892 of 2025, Cr. Misc. No. 34598 of 2025 and Cr. Misc. No. 78166 of 2025. He further submits that the police after investigation submitted the charge sheet and the petitioner is in custody since 11.10.2025.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the Informant have vehemently opposed the

3/4 prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, petitioner has clean antecedent and there is no specific allegation of assault or overt act against him and similarly situated co-accused persons have been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-X, Gaya in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 299 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:- i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

4/4 criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Suruchi/- U T