← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./3839/2024allowed

Md. Sahbaj @ Md. Sahbaj Alam v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-05Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3839 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-118 Year-2023 Thana- CHAUSA District- Madhepura ====================================================== Md. Sahbaj @ Md. Sahbaj Alam son of Md. Jabbar Village- Bhangra PsBhawanipur Dist- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Dilshana Khatoon wife of Md. Sahbaz Village- Diwantola Ps- Chousa DistMadhepura ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Girish Chandra Jha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP.

Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Adv.

Ms. Laxmi Kumari, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 05-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

3. Petitioner, who is husband of informant, is said to have tortured upon her physically and mentally and ousted her from the matrimonial home in association of his family members over the dowry demand.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has committed

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3839 of 2024(4) dt.05-07-2024 2/3 no offence. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is totally false and based on concocted facts. He has neither made any dowry demand nor drove her out of her matrimonial home nor tormented her over the demand of dowry. He is still ready to keep the informant with full honour and dignity, but the informant wants to live separately from her in-laws. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006 (3) PLJR 182. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para 3 of the bail application.

5. In that view of the matter, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Chousa P.S. Case No. 118 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

6. Petitioner is ready to pay Rs. 3,000.00 (Rupees Three Thousand) per month to the informant in the second week of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3839 of 2024(4) dt.05-07-2024 3/3 every month. If the petitioner fails to pay the aforesaid amount on two consecutive months, informant shall be at liberty to move before the learned Court below for cancelling the bail bond of the petitioner.

7. It goes without saying that the aforesaid payment shall be subject to any order being passed in matrimonial maintenance case or any other collateral proceedings.

8. Learned Court for the informant is directed to furnish the bank account details of the informant. If she fails to furnish the same, the aforesaid amount will be deposited in the learned Court below which will be released in favour of the informant after she furnishes her bank account details.

9. If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the learned Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Center for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement.

10. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this application stands disposed of.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T