Pramod Yadav v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.34498 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-89 Year-2016 Thana- GAYA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictGaya ====================================================== Pramod Yadav, Son of Ramjeet Yadav, Resident of Village- Jhazpeshara, of Jhajh, P.S.- Barachatti, District- Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Saroj Devi, Daughter of Suresh Yadav and Wife of Pramod Yadav, Resident of Village- Geywal Karma, P.S.- Barachatti, District- Gaya. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 498(A) and 323 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 30.3.2018 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34498 of 2018(2) dt.19-06-2018 2/2 falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/complaint case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Gaya Complaint Case No. 89/2016 Tr. No. 1198/18.
(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T