Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33769/2018allowed

Abhinandan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-06-20Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33769 of 2018 (2) dt.20-06-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.33769 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -185 Year- 2017 Thana -PIPRA District- SUPAUL ====================================================== Abhinandan Kumar S/o Ramchandra Sah, R/o Vill.- Hatwariya, P.S.- Pipra, District- Supaul.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Arun, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 20-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The petitioner, who is in custody since 29.09.2017, has renewed his prayer for bail in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 185 of 2017 for the offence alleged under Sections 25(1-B)A, 26, 35 of the Arms Act having earlier been rejected by this Court by order dated 12.01.2018 in Cr. Misc. No. 1963 of 2018.

3. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case and having regard to the period of custody already suffered since 29.09.2017, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-3rd, Supaul, in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 185 of 2017, on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33769 of 2018 (2) dt.20-06-2018 the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/BT U T