Patna High CourtCR. MISC./86645/2025bail granted

Md. Muzaffar @ Md. Mujaffar @ Muzaffar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-03-30Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86645 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-264 Year-2025 Thana- RAUTA District- Purnia ====================================================== Md. Muzaffar @ Md. Mujaffar @ Muzaffar Son of Md. Mojib @ Md. Mojib Rahman @ Md. Mujib Resident Of Village- Chouni Khapra, Ps- Baisi, DistPurnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar 2.

Kuresha Begum @ Queresha Begum Wife of Md. Tasleem Resident Of Village- Gram Madhapur, Panchayat- Majhauk, Ps- Rauta, Dist- Purnea ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md. Helal Ahmad, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, APP For the Informant :

Mr.Naushad Akhter, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 30-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Rauta P.S. Case No. 264/2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 137(2), 96, 64 and 3(5) of B.N.S. and Section 4 of POCSO Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner is alleged of kidnapping the victim.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that from the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86645 of 2025(4) dt.30-03-2026 2/2 statement of the victim, it appears that she has eloped with the petitioner. Petitioner has clean antecedent and he is in custody since 01.11.2025. The petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the case/ trial.

5. Learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State have jointly opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this application for regular bail is allowed.

7. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, POCSO, Purnea /concerned Court below in connection with Rauta P.S. Case No. 264/2025.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) tusharika/- U T