Sri Ram Kumar @ Sriram Chauhan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80812 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-361 Year-2019 Thana- MAKHDUMPUR District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.
SRI RAM KUMAR @ SRIRAM CHAUHAN S/o Ram Dayal Chauhan R/o village- Ner, P.S.- Makhdumpur, District- Jehanabad (Bihar) 2.
Pankaj Kumar @ Pankaj Chauhan S/o Ram Dayal Chauhan R/o village- Ner, P.S.- Makhdumpur, District- Jehanabad (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Uma Shankar Sharma For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ashraf Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 21-01-2020 Petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in connection with Makhdumpur P.S. Case No. 361 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 448, 341, 323, 324, 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. As per FIR petitioners and other accused persons assaulted the informant and specific allegation is against petitioner No.2 of assaulting the brother-in-law of the informant and causing injury to him.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is case and counter case between the parties and no specific allegation has been attributed against petitioner No.1 and injury report disclosed that opinion on the injury on the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80812 of 2019(2) dt.21-01-2020 2/2 brother-in-law of the informant is kept reserved. Heard learned APP also.
In view of above facts and circumstances, let petitioner No.1, in the event of surrender, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Jehanabad, in connection with Makhdumpur P.S. Case No. 361 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and further condition is that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
So far petitioner No.2 is concerned, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to him. He has to surrender and pray for regular bail.
Accordingly, this application is disposed of. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T