Suraj Kumar v. The Vigilance Bureau, Bihar, Patna

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.35058 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -52 Year- 2017 Thana -KARPI District- JEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Suraj Kumar, Son of Bijendra Kumar, Resident of Village- Ranapur, P.S.- Rampur Chauram District- Arwal Panchayat Teacher Prathmik Vidhyalay Budhu Bigha, Gram Panchayat Murari, P.S.- Karpi, DistrictArwal. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Vigilance Bureau, Bihar, Patna.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Paras Nath For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ramakant Sharma (L.O.,Inc.Vigi.) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-07-2018 The petitioner is apprehending their arrest in connection with Karpi P.S. Case No. 52/17, registered for offences punishable under Sections 409, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 472/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of securing job of teacher on the basis of forged documents as his father name appeared in BETET mark-sheet is different from the application form submitted by the petitioner.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been terminated from the service and he himself has suffered a lot and is ready to abide by any condition imposed on him. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35058 of 2018 (2) dt.06-07-2018 2/2 before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Arwal in connection with Karpi P.S. Case No. 52/17, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T