Munna Ram @ Munna Roy @ Munna v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89750 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-414 Year-2024 Thana- BAHADURPUR District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Munna Ram @ Munna Roy @ Munna S/o Late Baidhnath Ram @ Baijnath Roy Resident of Village- Dekuli, P S.- Bahadurpur, Dist- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Saurav Anand, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 414 of 2024 dated 18.10.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 309(4) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. As per the prosecution case, on 18.10.2024 at about 8:30 P.M., the informant closed his furniture shop and went towards Piprolia road, in the meantime, two unknown miscreants boarded on a motorcycle intercepted the informant and started assaulting him by belt and snatched the key of his motorcycle. It is further alleged that the unknowns miscreants snatched the informant's motorcycle bearing registration No.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89750 of 2024(2) dt.19-02-2025 2/3 BR07AB5117 and pushed him in ditch and fled away towards orchard.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. The name of the petitioner has sprung up in the confessional statement of the co-accused Akash Kumar Paswan. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner rather the recovery of looted motorcycle has been made from the possession of the co-accused Birju @ Birju Mahto. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 19.10.2024.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation levelled against the petitioner as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Darbhanga in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 414 of 2024.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89750 of 2024(2) dt.19-02-2025 3/3
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Jyoti/- U T