Ravi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9881 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-715 Year-2022 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Ravi Kumar Son Of Salendra Vishkarma Resident Of Village- Noni, PsTekari, Distt- Gaya 2.

Sushil Kumar Son Of Sanjay Kumar Resident Of Village- Noni, Ps- Tekari, Distt- Gaya 3.

Niraj Kumar Son Of Satendra Kumar Mahto Resident Of Village- Noni, PsTekari, Distt- Gaya 4.

Nitish Kumar @ Chhoti Son Of Parsuram Mahto @ Pashuram Singh Resident Of Village- Noni, Ps- Tekari, Distt- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Saxena, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 715 of 2022 for the offence punishable 307, 379, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant's son went to the agricultural land for the purpose of irrigation but after seeing alone, the accused persons armed with lathi, danda and iron-rod assaulted the informant's son causing injury. The coaccused Adity Kumar assaulted on the head of his son causing

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9881 of 2024(2) dt.29-02-2024 2/3 cut injury. It is further alleged that the injured was admitted to A.N.M.M.C.H, Gaya for batter treatment.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. The petitioners have clean antecedent. The specific allegation of assault is against the co-accused Aditya Kumar. He also submits that the petitioners are influential persons and have good and sound reputation either in their society or in their locality too.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the material available on the record, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on each of them furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Gaya in connection with Takari P.S. Case No. 715 of 2022, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9881 of 2024(2) dt.29-02-2024 3/3

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Prakash/- U