Yasmin Aash @ Yasmina Parween @ Yasmina Parweena v. The State Of Bihar And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3985 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3919 of 2025 ====================================================== 1.

Yasmin Aash @ Yasmina Parween @ Yasmina Parweena Wife of Wazir Alam Resident of Ward no 8, Haruwatanga Police Station-Dighal Bank, District- Kishanganj.

2.

Anjari Begum Wife of Abdul Kalam Resident of Aambadi, P.O. Lohagada Haat, PS-Garbhandanga, District- Kishanganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar and Ors. through the Additional Chief Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The State Election Commission through its secretary, 3rd floor, Sone Bhawan, Beer Chand Patel Path, Patna 3.

The Officer on Special Duty, State Election Commission, 3rd floor, Sone Bhawan, Beer Chand Patel Path, Patna.

4.

The District Magistrate, Kishanganj 5.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Kishanganj.

6.

The Executive Officer Cum Block Development Officer, Dighal Bank, District- Kishanganj.

7.

Md. Mushtaque Son of Haji Samiruddin, The elected member of Block 8.

Sharwan Kumar, Son of Sahdev Rajbhat, the elected member of Block 9.

Shiva Devi, Wife of Shiv Narayan Yadav, the elected member of Block 10.

Ram Prasad Ganesh, Son of Chamu Lal Ganesh, The elected member of 11.

Bijli Devi Wife of Arun Dev Giri, The elected member of Block Panchayati Dighalbank, through the block development officer-cum-executive officer, block Panchayat Samiti, Dighalbank, PO and PS - Dighal Bank, District Kishanganj.

12.

Pankaj Kumar, Son of Late Mohan Pandey, The elected member of Block

2/4 13.

Pramila Devi, Wife of Jageshwar Goswami, The elected member of Block 14.

Minnat Parveen, Wife of Farooque Alam, the elected member of Block 15.

Akthari Begum Wife of Ayub Alam, The elected member of Block 16.

Maleka Khatoon, Wife of Mohsin Ali, The elected member of Block 17.

Aasma Khatoon Wife of Abdul Latif, The elected member of Block 18.

Mustafi Begum Wife of Md. Akhtar, The elected member of Block 19.

Abdul Kaiyum, Son of Tauheed Alam, The elected member of Block 20.

Ajmat Ali Son of Nizamuddin, The elected member of Block Panchayati Dighalbank, through the block development officer-cum-executive officer, block Panchayat Samiti, Dighalbank, PO and PS - Dighal Bank, District Kishanganj.

21.

Kishore Kunal Son of Late Prithwi Chand Singh, the elected member of 22.

Vijender Kumar Murmu Son of Kishun Murmu, The elected member of 23.

Dilnaz Begum Wife of Abdul Rahim, The elected member of Block 24.

Md. Miftabhul Haque Son of Abdul Mannan, The elected member of Block

3/4 25.

Ruquaiya Khatoon Wife of Late Najibur Rahman, the elected member of 26.

Yar Mohammad Son of Abdul Wahab, The elected member of Block 27.

Zafar Hasnain Son of Shamshul Hoda, The elected member of Block ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Ansul, Sr. Advocate Mr. Kislay Raj, Advocate For the State : Mr. Kumar Alok, SC-7 For the Commission : Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Advocate Mr. Girish Pandey, Advocate For the Private Respondents:

Mr. Amit Shrivastava, Sr. Advocate Mr. Parijat Saurav, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 07-01-2026 Heard Mr. Ansul, learned Senior counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Kumar Alom, learned Standing Counsel for the State, Mr. Ravi Ranjan, learned counsel for the State Election Commission and Mr. Amit Shrivastav, learned Senior counsel for the Private Respondents.

2. This application has been filed for restoration of CWJC No. 3919 of 2025 which stood dismissed for default for non-prosecution by order dated 04.03.2025.

3. For the reasons stated in the restoration petition, the prayer for restoration is allowed and C.W.J.C. No. 3919 of

4/4 2025 is restored to its original file.

4. MJC No. 3985 of 2025 stands disposed of.

5. Pending application (s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

6. It appears from the office notes dated 15.04.2025 in C.W.J.C. No. 3919 of 2025, requisites of notices upon Respondent Nos. 7 to 27 have been filed on 27.03.2025 after delay of one day.

7. In view of the aforesaid, Office is directed to accept the requisites of notices upon Respondent Nos. 7 to 27 having been filed on 27.03.2025 after delay of one day and send the same to the parties concerned.

Ibrar//- (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) U